Today was the
United Nations International Day for the Eradication of Poverty.
In fact, it's the 20th anniversary of the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty.
It's interesting that 20 years on half the world's population lives on less than two United States dollars a day. As horrible as that sounds (and $2 doesn't buy you much anywhere in the world), it's actually worse. That $2 is actually based on the theory of purchasing power parity and often matched to the local equivalent of what $2 would have bought you in New York City in 1990.
So, we have half the world unable to afford a decent meal in New York and several hundred million living (more like slowly dying on) half that again.
That I can sit here on the carpet (choosing not to sit on the couch) in a warm room, with a pleasently full tummy and slightly cold feet (through the sheer laziness of not wanting to get up and find socks), and type on a laptop connected to the world via wireless broadband, makes me one of the richest people in the world.
I may not feel like it (and there are certainly a whole lot of people with vastly more money and wealth), but I'm living in absolute luxury by pretty much anyone's standards (or at least the standards of the 90% of the world's population not as well off as me).
If you are reading this, it's highly likely you aren't much different - perhaps you are even luckier than me, or perhaps somewhat less so (financially at least). But either way, you are one of the lucky ones. This isn't to say you don't work hard for your money, or that you shouldn't enjoy the fruits of your labours. But it is to say that you should feel some sense of obligation to those people who don't have the ability to enjoy the rewards of their labour - the unlucky majority.
Peter Singer wrote a powerful essay in 1977.
The drowning child and the expanding circle is as relevant today as it was 30 years ago. It's available
here.
There is much that we can do, but perhaps the single most important thing is to put pressure on donor governments around the world to meet their commitments under the
Millennium Development Goals and the Monterrey Consensus and give 0.7% of GDP in official development assistance.
Australia currently gives 0.3%, which is very middle of the road.
Obviously increasing the volume of aid alone is not enough. We are getting much better in the ways we spend aid money and some ODA does huge amounts of good. The trick is to ensure that the most possible aid is being spent in the best possible way, and we're still some way from getting to that point.
Still, a committment is a committment and we need to live up to it. To be held to account. To follow through on our promises (something the Howard government has not been very good at doing to date).
One can only hope that in another 20 years, we'll be celebrating the International Day of Remembering When People Lived in Poverty.